XRP’s slight decline follows Ripple’s stark SEC clarification, stirring market uncertainty amid ongoing legal battles and price volatility.

XRP News Today: Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer Douses Settlement Hopes in SEC Case | FXEmpire

Ripple (XRP) price hovers below key resistance at $0.50, on Thursday.

XRP fails to break above $0.50 as former SEC litigator predicts Ripple case could reach Supreme Court

Ripple&#x27;s chief legal officer (CLO) Stuart Alderoty says the payments company is taking action in response to a court filing submitted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) last month.

Ripple To File Response to SEC’s $2,000,000,000 Penalty Request Within a Week, Says the Payments Firm’s CLO - The Daily Hodl

While Ripple is widely viewed as “a payments-first company” providing a blockchain-based payment solution to solve economic and financial friction, recent developments are broadening its appeal to both TradFi and decentralized finance (DeFi) players.

Tokenized asset market could hit $16T on public blockchains — RippleX VP

Amidst regulatory challenges and court disputes, Ripple Labs Inc. continues its legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a

Ripple vs. SEC Lawsuit Update: Preparing for April 22nd as Supreme Court Showdown Looms - Coinpedia Fintech News

XRPL NFTs to become part of a massive event that is projected to attract 28 million people

Ripple Exec on SBI Initiative: "This Is Going to Be Huge"

Ripple (XRP) struggles to surpass its crucial $0.50 threshold yet again, marking the fourth consecutive day of unsuccessful attempts to breach and sustain resistance.

Ripple Vs. SEC Update: XRP Facing Challenges For Recovery Amid Lingering Ripple Lawsuit, Warns Former SEC Litigator - Forex News by FX Leaders

After undergoing a significant decline, breaching multiple crucial support levels, Ripple&#x27;s price has found stability near the important $0.5 mark.

Ripple Price Analysis: What's Next for XRP Following the Recent Crash?

Get the most recent info and news about Ripple on HackerNoon, where 10k+ technologists publish stories for 4M+ monthly readers.

Using proven crypto and blockchain technology honed over a decade, Ripple’s enterprise-grade solutions are faster, more transparent, and more cost-effective than traditional financial services. Our customers use these solutions to source crypto, facilitate instant payments, empower their treasury, engage new audiences, lower capital requirements, and drive new revenue.
Founded in 2012, Ripple's vision is to enable a world where value moves as seamlessly as information flows today—an Internet of Value. Ripple is the only enterprise blockchain company today with products in commercial use. Ripple’s global payments network includes over 300 customers across 40+ countries and  six continents.

Ripple

While the wider cryptocurrency market is having to contend with high volatility and widespread uncertainty, XRP appears to be thriving. With the SEC dropping its long-standing appeal against Ripple, could it finally live up to its potential? The Securities and Exchange Commission first opened its lawsuit against Ripple in December 2020 before XRP reached a low of $0.16 on January 2, 2021. By January 18, 2025, XRP was trading at $2.63, and with the SEC ending its interest in the coin, there’s plenty of optimism for Ripple to rally higher. “Today marks a historic victory—for Ripple, our employees and customers, and for the entire crypto industry,” said Brad Garlinghouse, Ripple CEO in a statement. “After more than four years of litigation, the SEC will drop its appeal against Ripple, concluding the SEC’s 4+ year long lawsuit. This is subject to Commission vote and approval.” Much has been made of Ripple’s impressive technical attributes. Notably, its Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm, which validates transactions through designated servers until they reach a supermajority agreement. It’s this algorithm that’s helped to make Ripple far more functional than other major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and has paved the way for transactions to be processed in just three to five seconds while handling up to 1,500 transactions per second. Crucially, it’s this high-speed blockchain network that gives Ripple plenty of potential use cases as cryptocurrency continues its emergence into mainstream adoption. But could removing the shackles of SEC scrutiny just be the beginning of Ripple’s journey? Let’s take a deeper look at the coin’s prospects for 2025 and beyond: Functionality is Ripple’s USP Not many cryptocurrencies that were launched in 2012 possess blockchains that are flexible enough to transform the fintech landscape, but Ripple is an excellent asset when it comes to fast cross-border payments. When institutions use Ripple to make a payment overseas, XRP acts as a bridge currency to optimize currency transfers in a fast and low-cost manner. Whether this means performing a direct currency exchange or using XRP as an intermediary, the flexibility Ripple provides can actively help reduce transaction costs without the need for appointing middlemen to handle the task. Many forecasters suggest that cryptocurrency will become increasingly integrated into mainstream usage thanks to more regulatory clarity from the SEC’s new acting director Mark Uyeda, Ripple could be one of the key beneficiaries of the many functional cryptocurrencies throughout the ecosystem. In fact, LMAX Group recently incorporated XRP into its institutional trading infrastructure, intending to offer institutions better access to highly liquid assets throughout markets. LMAX, which provides institutional execution venues for forex and digital assets trading, also acquired FX HedgePool, an institutional swaps matching service, and appears to have highlighted Ripple as an effective resource for boosting efficiency. “Ripple’s utility in lowering transaction costs for international payments makes it a potential leader in financial systems and fintech,” explains Maxim Manturov, head of investment advice at Freedom24. “If Ripple's global partnerships continue to expand, the price of XRP could reach $5-$8.” Growth Isn’t Assured Despite a strong start to 2025 and a flow of good news, XRP is showing signs of strain amid more widespread bearish market sentiment. Worryingly, some cryptocurrency analysts believe that market pressures could push Ripple below $2 if support barriers are retested amid an increasingly volatile outlook for crypto. One of the challenges of crypto’s emergence into mainstream adoption is that the landscape is more vulnerable to Wall Street price movements, and wider macroeconomic pressures could stunt XRP’s growth in 2025 as investment banks like Goldman Sachs cut their S&P 500 forecasts for the year ahead. It’s also worth looking at a decline in XRP funding rates, which have been mostly negative in recent weeks as traders open short positions following more widespread crypto market challenges. Funding rates refer to the periodic payments between traders holding long and short positions to keep the price of perpetual futures contracts linked to the underlying asset they’re tracking. However, a cause for optimism is that XRP’s bearish sentiment of late is far less pronounced than the likes of other popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), indicating that an upturn in sentiment could see Ripple outperform the wider market. Adoption Ahead Whether Ripple goes parabolic in 2025 or not will likely depend more on the state of the wider economic outlook in the United States and beyond. However, evidence of the incorporation of cryptocurrencies into the mainstream financial sector is likely to be a catalyst for growth for functional assets like XRP. Crypto’s push towards the mainstream will transform the industry and can help to provide more exposure to its brightest projects. In terms of payment efficiency, an emboldened Ripple that’s free from the SEC’s shackles could form a formidable force. The future is difficult to predict amid wider crypto market volatility, but it’s difficult to think of a more exciting prospect in the cryptocurrency space right now than a resurgent Ripple. While the wider cryptocurrency market is having to contend with high volatility and widespread uncertainty, XRP appears to be thriving. With the SEC dropping its long-standing appeal against Ripple, could it finally live up to its potential? The Securities and Exchange Commission first opened its lawsuit against Ripple in December 2020 before XRP reached a low of $0.16 on January 2, 2021. By January 18, 2025, XRP was trading at $2.63, and with the SEC ending its interest in the coin, there’s plenty of optimism for Ripple to rally higher. “Today marks a historic victory—for Ripple, our employees and customers, and for the entire crypto industry,” said Brad Garlinghouse , Ripple CEO in a statement. “After more than four years of litigation, the SEC will drop its appeal against Ripple, concluding the SEC’s 4+ year long lawsuit. This is subject to Commission vote and approval.” said Brad Garlinghouse said Brad Garlinghouse Much has been made of Ripple’s impressive technical attributes. Notably, its Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm, which validates transactions through designated servers until they reach a supermajority agreement. It’s this algorithm that’s helped to make Ripple far more functional than other major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and has paved the way for transactions to be processed in just three to five seconds while handling up to 1,500 transactions per second. Crucially, it’s this high-speed blockchain network that gives Ripple plenty of potential use cases as cryptocurrency continues its emergence into mainstream adoption. But could removing the shackles of SEC scrutiny just be the beginning of Ripple’s journey? Let’s take a deeper look at the coin’s prospects for 2025 and beyond: Functionality is Ripple’s USP Not many cryptocurrencies that were launched in 2012 possess blockchains that are flexible enough to transform the fintech landscape, but Ripple is an excellent asset when it comes to fast cross-border payments. When institutions use Ripple to make a payment overseas, XRP acts as a bridge currency to optimize currency transfers in a fast and low-cost manner. Whether this means performing a direct currency exchange or using XRP as an intermediary, the flexibility Ripple provides can actively help reduce transaction costs without the need for appointing middlemen to handle the task. bridge currency bridge currency Many forecasters suggest that cryptocurrency will become increasingly integrated into mainstream usage thanks to more regulatory clarity from the SEC’s new acting director Mark Uyeda, Ripple could be one of the key beneficiaries of the many functional cryptocurrencies throughout the ecosystem. increasingly integrated increasingly integrated In fact, LMAX Group recently incorporated XRP into its institutional trading infrastructure, intending to offer institutions better access to highly liquid assets throughout markets. better access better access LMAX, which provides institutional execution venues for forex and digital assets trading, also acquired FX HedgePool, an institutional swaps matching service, and appears to have highlighted Ripple as an effective resource for boosting efficiency. “Ripple’s utility in lowering transaction costs for international payments makes it a potential leader in financial systems and fintech,” explains Maxim Manturov, head of investment advice at Freedom24. “If Ripple's global partnerships continue to expand, the price of XRP could reach $5-$8.” Growth Isn’t Assured Despite a strong start to 2025 and a flow of good news, XRP is showing signs of strain amid more widespread bearish market sentiment. Worryingly, some cryptocurrency analysts believe that market pressures could push Ripple below $2 if support barriers are retested amid an increasingly volatile outlook for crypto. cryptocurrency analysts cryptocurrency analysts One of the challenges of crypto’s emergence into mainstream adoption is that the landscape is more vulnerable to Wall Street price movements, and wider macroeconomic pressures could stunt XRP’s growth in 2025 as investment banks like Goldman Sachs cut their S&P 500 forecasts for the year ahead. cut their S&P 500 forecasts cut their S&P 500 forecasts It’s also worth looking at a decline in XRP funding rates, which have been mostly negative in recent weeks as traders open short positions following more widespread crypto market challenges. mostly negative mostly negative Funding rates refer to the periodic payments between traders holding long and short positions to keep the price of perpetual futures contracts linked to the underlying asset they’re tracking. However, a cause for optimism is that XRP’s bearish sentiment of late is far less pronounced than the likes of other popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), indicating that an upturn in sentiment could see Ripple outperform the wider market. Adoption Ahead Whether Ripple goes parabolic in 2025 or not will likely depend more on the state of the wider economic outlook in the United States and beyond. However, evidence of the incorporation of cryptocurrencies into the mainstream financial sector is likely to be a catalyst for growth for functional assets like XRP. Crypto’s push towards the mainstream will transform the industry and can help to provide more exposure to its brightest projects. In terms of payment efficiency, an emboldened Ripple that’s free from the SEC’s shackles could form a formidable force. The future is difficult to predict amid wider crypto market volatility, but it’s difficult to think of a more exciting prospect in the cryptocurrency space right now than a resurgent Ripple.

Ripple in Time: Is XRP About to Go Parabolic in 2025?

A few days ago, Ripple (the company that issues XRP) announced its plans for a new USD-backed stablecoin. In an interview, Ripple’s CEO Brad Garlinghouse said that the stablecoin would be launched this year. It will be backed by dollar deposits, short-term government bonds and cash equivalents. The new stablecoin will be launched on XRP (no surprise) and ETH blockchains (no surprise; Ripple chose the “industry standard” and ignored direct competitors). Ripple will later announce which exchanges will list the new stablecoin. The stablecoin market is rapidly growing amid rising interest for crypto markets. Tether (USDT) remains the main issuer of stablecoins with a market cap approaching $107 billion. Circle’s USDC has started to recover from the blow dealt by the U.S. regional banks crisis in early 2023. Its market cap has already settled above the $32 billion level. Other competitors are far behind USDT and USDC. Interestingly, PayPal’s stablecoin, which was launched back in August 2023, failed to gain traction despite the company’s large user base. Currently, PYUSD market cap does not exceed $200 million. The key reason for the failure is the lack of a clear use case and strategy. It looks that PayPal’s user base was the only idea behind the creation of the company’s stablecoin. Ripple’s stablecoin has better potential as the company understands crypto markets. However, the stablecoin must capture significant market share to be viable in the long term. It should be noted that the new stablecoin would not be a direct competitor to USDT as it will be under strict control of U.S. regulators. Those who want to see that stablecoin’s reserves are fully inside the U.S. financial circuit choose the world’s second largest stablecoin, USDC. XRP must prove that its product is better than the established USDC. Most likely, we’ll see more stablecoins launched this year. This trend is driven by two catalysts — high U.S. government bond yields (that’s how issuers make profits) and rising interest for crypto. However, there’s no threat to the dominance of USDT, which remains a unique product. A few days ago, Ripple (the company that issues XRP) announced its plans for a new USD-backed stablecoin. A few days ago, Ripple (the company that issues XRP) announced its plans for a new USD-backed stablecoin. announced In an interview, Ripple’s CEO Brad Garlinghouse said that the stablecoin would be launched this year. It will be backed by dollar deposits, short-term government bonds and cash equivalents. The new stablecoin will be launched on XRP (no surprise) and ETH blockchains (no surprise; Ripple chose the “industry standard” and ignored direct competitors). Ripple will later announce which exchanges will list the new stablecoin. The stablecoin market is rapidly growing amid rising interest for crypto markets. Tether (USDT) remains the main issuer of stablecoins with a market cap approaching $107 billion. Circle’s USDC has started to recover from the blow dealt by the U.S. regional banks crisis in early 2023. Its market cap has already settled above the $32 billion level. Other competitors are far behind USDT and USDC. Interestingly, PayPal’s stablecoin, which was launched back in August 2023, failed to gain traction despite the company’s large user base. Currently, PYUSD market cap does not exceed $200 million. launched launched The key reason for the failure is the lack of a clear use case and strategy. It looks that PayPal’s user base was the only idea behind the creation of the company’s stablecoin. Ripple’s stablecoin has better potential as the company understands crypto markets. However, the stablecoin must capture significant market share to be viable in the long term. It should be noted that the new stablecoin would not be a direct competitor to USDT as it will be under strict control of U.S. regulators. Those who want to see that stablecoin’s reserves are fully inside the U.S. financial circuit choose the world’s second largest stablecoin, USDC. XRP must prove that its product is better than the established USDC. Most likely, we’ll see more stablecoins launched this year. This trend is driven by two catalysts — high U.S. government bond yields (that’s how issuers make profits) and rising interest for crypto. However, there’s no threat to the dominance of USDT, which remains a unique product.

Ripple’s Stablecoin: a Competitor to USDT?

Let's learn about via these 23 free stories. They are ordered by most time reading created on HackerNoon. Visit the to find the most read stories about any technology. Ripple /Learn Repo 1. Ripple Is Orders Of Magnitude Better Than SWIFT GPI and Correspondent Banking Protocols ripple vs sec might go on for a few months or years but there is no denying the wonder that is the ripple infrastructure in comparison to swift gpi 2. What are the differences between Bitcoin and XRP? Bitcoin's maximum supply is 21 million and XRP's maximum supply is 100 billion. The difference is that all XRP were created on the first day... 3. Pixelated Cryptocurrency GIFs: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Ripple (XRP) Hacker Noon has a new Giphy account. Our first 30 GIFs have created over 2.2 million views. Our first three cryptocurrency GIFs are the three coins with the highest market cap: 4. NFT Marketplace Entrepreneurs Seek to Cut Out the Middleman Right now, NFTs are at the peak of hype: Bored Ape #8585 just sold for $2.7 million, the NFT NYC conference was attended by Quentin Tarantino and Busta Rhymes, 5. Blockchain Developers' Report Q2 2020 An in-depth analysis of developer data revealing a year of meteoric rises and falls 6. The XRP Crisis Is A Reminder Of The Bitconnect Days 7. Crypto research of the July 2019 cryptocurrency activity Corindex July 2019 crypto report is comprised of parsed data on key cryptocurrency exchanges. Indicators, specifically designed by this crypto analytic platform, are calculated past the analysis of the blockchain network of various crypto assets. To best approximate the overall state of the cryptocurrency market, the report shows data only on the top cryptocurrencies with the largest capitalizations, and, occasionally, currencies that showed biggest relative changes by one indicator or another over the analyzed period. The report contains nine chapters, each of which encompasses the changes to its designated indicator over the analyzed period. 8. Only XRP and Bitcoin will be Safe if Ripple Wins SEC lawsuit In December 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Ripple, leading to a chain of events that threatens XRP and Bitcoin. 9. Coupling: The One and Only Software Designing Problem A root cause analysis of all failures of our software will find a single culprit with multiple costumes. The enemy is always there. Many times disguised as laziness, sometimes simplification, and very frequently with the optimization outfit. 10. How Does Ripple (XRP) Fare Against The Rising Tide Of Stablecoins? Once Ripple was identified as the incumbent to a brave new world of practical cryptocurrencies. Speculation was rife that Ripple’s XRP coin had the potential to overtake Bitcoin in terms of usage and utilise its swift and cost-effective transaction framework to take the world into the future of practical digital currency. 11. Know These Things Before Investing In XRP Before investing in XRP, you should know these things. XRP at 100 dollars can be possible but it would take several years. You can invest in the other cryptos. [12. XRP and ETN: Two approaches to helping people in developing countries](https://hackernoon.com/xrp-and-etn-two-approaches-to-helping-people-in-developing-countries-h76wo3zxb) Cryptocurrencies saw their inception just over 10 years ago after the creation of Bitcoin so in reality, digital currencies are still at their very early stages. Many cryptocurrency experts believe it will take another ten years before this form of currency goes mainstream. 13. Where and How To Buy Ripple (XRP)? It is XRPL that makes it possible to validate Ripple transactions in an average of three to five seconds. 14. Introduction to Ripple: The Story Behind XRP The company’s name behind the XRP crypto – Ripple – is often used to describe the digital currency XRP. 15. My Thoughts on Ripple (XRP) and Its Run-in With The US SEC Is XRP centralized? Yes, it is. Does that matter? YES, IT DOES! 16. How Metcalfe's Law Influences Blockchain Adoption And Innovation The Metcalfe effect has a substantial impact on the blockchain industry, shaping the adoption and expansion of blockchain technology. 17. The Battle Between Private and Public Blockchains Computers, Internet, and Mobile Phones The earliest known citation on the Internet is dated to 1986. It was attributed to Thomas J. Watson and posted in the signature of a poster from Convex Computer Corporation saying — “I think there is a world market for about five computers”. “Baloney. Do our computer pundits lack all common sense? The truth is no online database will replace your daily newspaper, no CD-ROM can take the place of a competent teacher and no computer network will change the way government works” — argued by Clifford Stoll, computer scientist in a featured article titled “The Internet? Bah!” published in Newsweek magazine. The go-to mobile business plan of Vodafone projected could sell only 1 million phones. All these prove that there is a tendency to underestimate the real impact and commercial potential of technologies as there are no existing realistic use cases developed, or the technology is not mature yet to unleash it’s true potential. 18. 2021 will be the year when DeFi and banks finally learn to work together The 2020 version of DeFi looked like a radical and frankly weird alternative to legacy banking. But in 2021, we might start moving to DeFi v.2 – one that banks and corporations can embrace. However, it will be very different from the sushi swaps and yield farming crazes that we've seen so far, with bank-friendly projects like Cryptoenter taking the lead. 19. Alternatives To The Bitcoin Blockchain Attempting To Answer The Scalability Question The battle for the place of the most scalable cryptocurrency has been going on for a long time – this is an eternal competition in the world of cryptocurrencies. 20. GAME of CRYPTOS [Chapter 3] — New CryptoKingdoms are born. It is the year of the Lord of 2013. 21. A Brief Look Into Ripple (XRP): Banks, Pre-mines, and Lawsuits tldr; This post is a brief look into the different aspects (good, bad, and ugly) of the XRP token and Ripple Labs, the company. It is important to separate the two while also investigating the indisputable overlap between the token and the company. 22. Should You Buy Ripple (XRP) in 2021? Compared to Bitcoin, XRP (also known as Ripple, its parent company) is not as well-known to the average person. 23. Distributed Ledger Technology and Blockchain When Combined With No-Code Abstracting away the technical complexity of blockchain components, Joget DX empowers non-coders to rapidly build decentralized applications (DApps). Thank you for checking out the 23 most read stories about Ripple on HackerNoon. to find the most read stories about any technology. Visit the /Learn Repo

23 Stories To Learn About Ripple

*Note: a SWOT analysis is an evaluation of the fundamental, operational, technical, social, economic, and even to some degree administrative elements of a project. This is not a model to be used for trading purposes. (NFA, DYOR) Composed of four elements, and , a SWOT analysis framework provides excellent insight for establishing a high-level understanding of the state of a project’s well-being through the lens of a birds-eye view. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats It can help formulate decisions around which areas require more attention, set performance goals, and organize a foundational understanding of where a project is headed. Rarely (if ever) used in crypto, it is time to apply this timeless method of evaluation to the digital asset space. Today, the most controversial OG crypto project, full of legal shenanigans, enterprise-grade technology, and die-hard community members, will get a SWOT. Ripple ( ) XRP , 💪 Strengths (Internal) (Helpful) 1. XRPL (Ledger) is Non-Turing Complete The Ledger used by Ripple is actually structurally reminiscent of Bitcoin and diametrically different from Ethereum. The XRPL is not able to support arbitrary computations or smart contracts; this was a design choice deliberately made by Ripple Labs in order to guarantee a higher level of stability and security for the network. By laser-purposing XRPL for a specific type of transaction (payments), the inherent negative externalities and uncertainties around smart contracts are avoided. 2. Deterministic Fees Something very unusual in the crypto landscape is stability; be it price, fees, user count, or any other metric, crypto is notorious for its volatility. Ripple’s ledger is the first of its kind to offer a model for fees that are set at 10 “drops” which translates to (1/100,000) of an XRP. With a predictable fee structure, a much more effective payment system can be built and a higher degree of transaction confidence would be experienced by users. This is in stark contrast to the tranny of Etheruem’s gas fees which are ridiculously hard to calculate and have historically spiked upwards into the hundreds of dollars. 3. Transaction Burn Mechanism Every single transaction on XRPL demands that a tiny portion of the token supply is burned. While the exact amount can vary, the base requirement is 10 drops or 0.00001 XRP, which has so far averaged out to somewhere between 5,000–10,000 XRP being burned per day (with massive outlier spikes, of course). The presence of the Burn mechanism exudes constant delayed pressure on upkeeping the token’s value as well as deterring network spam. Thus far, >11,000,000 XRP has been burned since inception; which is insignificant when considering how long it has been and how much more tokens still need to make it into circulation. 4. Supply Distribution Mechanism Another novel design around the token’s economics from Ripple labs. Set at a 100 Billion XRP max supply and with ~54% already in circulation, there are another >~46 Billion tokens that need to make their way to market; how this happens is arguably balanced. The non-circulating supply is locked in an escrow account that cannot be forced open; every month, 1 Billion tokens are unlocked/vested to the Ripple foundation, and the foundation has to distribute those tokens within the month. If they do not, the excess tokens are returned back to the escrow wallet, and the cycle repeats itself. This will happen indefinitely until all tokens are in circulation. 5. XLS-20 In October of 2022, Ripple released the XLS-20 standard framework, which brought NFTs to the XRPL ecosystem. Given that the overall potential market size of NFTs eclipses that of fungible assets, new vectors of value creation/retention and innovation are now possible on XRP. Since launch, a multitude of new communities has arrived on-chain, bringing with them an activity that has (proportionately) outperformed all other network metrics in 2023. 6. Built-in CLOB Any financial/monetary system requires the presence of a venue to conduct trade; within the world of crypto, these venues are DEXs. XRPL has a CLOB (Central Limit Order Book) decentralized exchange built in that facilities trade of cryptos, tokens, and NFTs. The CLOB model is much more appealing to large traditional financial institutions (than the crypto industry’s more common AMM) because it is what they have been using historically. The CLOB is also a single point that aggregates all liquidity, providing a higher degree of depth and lower slippage with high control over the order types and their granularity. 7. Technological Developments Ripple is constantly developing reliable, enterprise-grade technologies that keep up with the standards floating around the crypto industry, as well as those that are demanded/required by large traditional organizations and governments to operate. Currently, there is a pipeline of innovation as follows: an AMM being developed as per the XLS-30, Hooks system that will allow for semi-smart contract programmability (similar to the conditional scripts currently being used in the Bitcoin ecosystem), a Multi-chain ecosystem that leverages a variety of scaling solutions including the use of the EVM and sidechains, new identity solutions, XLS standards for off-chain transactions and improvements in the programming language used, among other things. 😞 Weaknesses (Internal) (Harmful) 1. Destination Tag System While this is a novel design that does have its merits within legacy financial circles, and it is not present in other crypto projects, it’s not one that is highly regarded by crypto natives. XRP utilizes a tracking/ownership account system where a single address has tags that allow it to manage funds on behalf of other people. Imagine a centralized exchange that has one address on XRPL and that one address receives/manages all the XRP balances of other users. Where on Bitcoin or Ethereum, every user has their own address, on Ripple’s Ledger, one address can become a bank that manages the XRP funds of other people, creating micro-hierarchies/federations within the network itself. This is potentially a positive for users that do not want to deal with the headaches associated with self-sovereignty but a red flag for the freedom maximalists. 2. PoA (Proof-of-Association) Using their own consensus model that does not have transactional or block reward incentives arouses suspicion, what does somebody have to gain by joining? Part of the argument here is that the burning mechanism will ultimately drive the value accrual for the nodes. This might prove to be a valid model that appeals to a grade of market participants who have a radically more developed psychological understanding than I might; however, from the lens of a crypto native, this does not seem appealing to newer/less capitalized actors and would translate to another model where the elites are able to secure ownership while users must just blindly trust their associations. 🧐 Opportunities (External) (Helpful) 1. SEC Court Case Everybody in the industry has heard about the recent outcome of the ruling by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres. Obviously, this is far from winning any war, but this has become the first signal of intellectual clarity from a regulatory entity. Granted, her ruling is very minute and only addresses the transactions pertaining to XRP taking place between retail investors on exchange venues, still leaving a legal gap around the sales of XRP from Ripple to private investors through the use of contracts as security transactions. Nevertheless, when looking over the long term, if Ripple does manage to pull this one off, survive the legal bashing, and continue its existence, this will be an anchoring precedent for not just XRP but for the entire crypto industry. By bolstering the industry from the legal side, XRP will become a household name and forever be honored as a maverick. 2. Support from Many Other Projects When launched, Ripple was like an ugly duckling that constantly caught heat from crypto maxis and projects about its centralization. After a decade (yes, Ripple has been around for more than 10 years now), that clamor has been more-or-less shut down, and everybody has rallied behind Ripple in support of them overcoming the legal issues they are so bravely fighting. 3. Working with ~20 Countries on CBDCs While CBDCs are the antithesis of crypto, their arrival into the world economy is neigh but inevitable. Here we see the power of Ripple’s brand and legendary team putting in the footwork and developing relationships with a multitude of nations to leverage XRPL for the issuance of their CBDCs. Some of the known countries include Palau, Colombia, and Montenegro. 😳 Threats (External) (Harmful) 1. SEC Court Case This element is both an opportunity if won and also a constant looming threat if things go really undesirably. In the event that XRP completely loses its court case (even though this is unlikely given the legal system’s ability to appeal basically indefinitely) that would cause crippling damage to both XRP and the industry as a whole. While this does only pertain to the jurisdictions of the US (a project as intelligent and well-resourced as Ripple, would likely find a way to continue existing outside of US oversight); having the US market is an enormous/outsized portion of the world’s money. Takeaway: Ripple is an absolute Powerhouse. They are a beacon of quality and the center of attention for all those watching the regulatory developments around crypto within the US. The project is obviously ultra-high quality and the people working behind it are world class. The technology of the project and the finesse with which it is developed (in regard to the overall finance and technology sectors) is something that many new-age projects should be learning from. Had there been no legal issues facing Ripple, it would be feasible to consider that it would have been much further along; at the same time, seeing its relentless development (business and technology) while juggling the obnoxious legal system gives them the right to own a permanent place in the digital industry (which they already have secured). Conclusion: I was actually one of the anti-ripple people back when I first got involved in crypto. Much of it was my own immaturity, lack of understanding, and desire to virtue signal my moral alignment with decentralization. Since then, and especially in light of the XRP vs SEC combat that began in 2020, my stance has changed. First and foremost, the very meaning of decentralization and its application to crypto/finance has now become much more concrete; projects don't have to be decentralized; the industry does; by virtue of allowing anybody to propose anything, decentralization is present; shutting out another participant because their system is “centralized” is unwise; freedom of choice is what we seek. Ripple will be a name that becomes synonymous with legacy giga-corporations such as Blackrock, Microsoft, and the such (I'm not saying they are the same type of companies; I'm just saying they will be equally important in their own right). Would I invest in XRP? Sheesh. Let me put it this way; Right now, today, No. I believe there is one more strong selloff ahead for the overall industry, and the recent price action is just overhyped money sloshing around (not new money coming in). However, at the right price point (maybe ~$0.50, yes, absolutely, I’d grab another bag). Something in the 1%–3% range of a crypto portfolio allocation is not out of the picture. If you know something that I don’t or feel as though I might have missed anything worth noting, please do share, I would tremendously appreciate some feedback. Thank you so much for reading, I hope this serves you well on your journey. Live long and prosper 🥂 Also published here

The Ripple (XRP) SWOT Analysis

দ্য রিপল (XRP) SWOT বিশ্লেষণ

Die SWOT-Analyse von Ripple (XRP).

El análisis DAFO de Ripple (XRP)

Analyse SWOT de l'ondulation (XRP)

रिपल (एक्सआरपी) एसडब्ल्यूओटी विश्लेषण

リップル (XRP) SWOT 分析

리플(XRP) SWOT 분석

O Ripple (XRP) Análise SWOT

Dalgalanma (XRP) SWOT Analizi

Phân tích SWOT của Ripple (XRP)

瑞波币 (XRP) SWOT 分析

I recently sat down with Harris Bricken Attorney and web3 legal expert, , for a discussion about the controversial . (This interview has been abridged for the ease of the readers) .Read on! Jonathan Bench SEC V Ripple case It's good to once again sit down with you for a discussion about cryptocurrency and other related matters affecting the industry. I would like you to tell us about the background story of the SEC V Ripple case. I have been in the crypto space for a couple of years now. I came as an international transactions lawyer kind of understanding where things are coming from. So my my perspective is pretty broad. This decision on Ripple is what everyone had been waiting for a long time. Ever since I have been paying attention to the industry very closely, I've been waiting to see, you know, how the kind of attack the SEC would take against Ripple and what the court would agree to. And you got to keep in mind that this is a low-level court decision. There's still a Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, and this covers all of the financial headquarters, but what we think in the US so very significant in terms of the geography of the decision. And there's also a lot a long way to go from here. So the background is simple. For those of you that don't know a lot about it or at least have been following it kind of tangentially like I was from the early days, it's a pretty typical scenario where we have founders who took the Bitcoin code, wanted to improve it and kind of replace Bitcoin and make it more functional. So they developed, they developed the token, they have a smart contract Ledger and they kept about 20% of the minted tokens for themselves and then contributed that 80% of the remaining tokens to Ripple Labs entity to develop software to help manage the international payment transactions. It's pretty typical from what I'm seeing in the crypto space. A lot of companies have been issuing tokens that compete with Bitcoin in some way and there's really not a lot of functionality. You know that's kind of where we're sitting in terms of understanding where this case sits in the precedent and this is a very early project, right? They started doing this around 2012. So in terms of the US legal system, ten years is a long time for a project to be out running before getting any kind of legal action against, and of course it's taking a couple of years for the court to really come down with this decision. We have a free-floating token competing with Bitcoin and a lot of adoption. The market cap for XRP's is fairly insane in terms of overall value. So that's kind of where I'm seeing this in terms of where it fits in the industry. https://youtu.be/Q-nNSG8zNT8?embedable=true Do you consider the SEC’s action to be grandstanding or scapegoating? I have a little bit of background on this. I have worked for a summer during law school for FINRA and FINRA is kind of the principal's office for the securities industry. So anybody with a trading license, all the firms you'll get regulated by FINRA, and FINRA has the same kind of mandate to you know their mandate is investor protection, market integrity. And so I feel like that's the mantra that we're talking about here is how close, how close to these cases hue to that ethos of making sure the market is as clear and open as possible, that investors are protected, know what they're getting into. And I feel like there is some overreaching by the SEC in terms of not being willing to engage very deeply and looking at tokens beyond those tokens that are trying to act as pure currencies. So like I said here with XRP, it seems to be very much focused on cryptocurrency. So from my perspective, the way that the SEC came down, the way the court decided this, I felt like it was fairly consistent with my understanding of how I thought it would come down where we are just dealing with something that looks like a traditional currency. You know, a lot of projects between then and now have tried to add a lot more functionality. We have a lot more utility tokens. We have things that could be classified as security tokens, but there are a lot more complicated than traditional security tokens we have. We have this 4th prong of the Howie test where it's really interesting. You know this case is fairly consistent with the way I've been advising my clients and others who I have  been talking to along the way. This looks and feels like security to a large degree to me. And of course, the court didn't get to all of the nuances that we want. The court’s holding is limited to the actual facts of the case and so if you read the footnotes you'll see kind of read them as I did and feel a little unsatisfied because we want the court to give us opinions on them. How Has XRP as a cryptocurrency failed the Howey Test? The Howie test is an old Supreme Court case that looks at what an investment contract is. That's kind of standard in the US parlance when we're talking about securities. When we're talking about investment contracts traditionally,  they kind of get pushed together. And so we have 4 prongs. It has to be an investment of money or other consideration in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits derived solely from the efforts of others. So typically I look at the fourth prong. What is being done in terms of the effort? If I give you a pile of money or crypto and you have a project that seems pretty clear I'm relying on you to do all of the work. The difference in the decentralized world is we have protocols that allow input in all kinds of different ways and so we don't have that guidance yet in terms of where the lines were and how much effort.  You know is it a 50-50 effort. If I'm doing less than 5% of the overall effort for the organization or the project, does that mean that I'm primarily relying on someone else's efforts or how much do I have to contribute? So I think about this in the context of DAO, especially because DAOs have 1000 members but everyone votes on every decision through the smart contract protocol. To me, that looks like everyone's participating. You know there are a lot of traditional companies where people will just have passive investor seed or a board observer seat, maybe they won't even vote or they will have a voting interest on the board and it's a shareholder going to have a vote anyway. So there are a lot of different nuances for this and so I think. Is it a great illustration for when this digital world that we're in and we're building an intersection of in a very bad way, very unsatisfying way with legal precedent that's been around for decades. Utah has done a great job and Rob Lam is a close friend of mine and mentor in this space. Yeah, and he was instrumental. I could see his hands in in the Utah DAO legislation that was passed earlier this year and will go into effect on January 1, 2024. So I see that as some of the most forward-looking legislation that I've read across the world. A lot of the current virtual asset service provider regimes for instance in the Caymans. They provide the framework and kind of general guidance. But I see the Utah DAO Act is really diving deep into the issues that matter. You can tell that the group that was put together by the Utah Blockchain Coalition helped advise the legislators on this Utah DAO Act. You can tell that they put a lot of thought into not just what the lawyers thought was important, but what the industry thinks is important. And practitioners of DAOs who have these issues are addressing a lot of issues wrapped around a DAO manager. And I feel like if the SEC and courts are looking for a model to address this new 4th prom, how does this new technology enable interaction with the 4th prong of the Howie test? Absolutely,it's a great model. I don't think it's going to be a cure-all because I'm sure there are things that were missed in Utah DAO  Act but I think it's much more forward-looking than any of the other legislation that I've seen in terms of addressing how much do the efforts of others matter and how big is the group of people that can be involved from a foundational stage of an enterprise. Because typically that's where the line is. You have a big difference between a founding team and then those who are added later as investors. So if you have a situation in doubt where you can marry those and have the founding team expanded to include 1000 to 2000 or 5000 people, what does that mean in terms of the capital they're putting at risk in the venture and putting it to the war chest of the DAO or whatever the project is going to be. So it may have to do with the timing. You know how early people get involved and maybe does will have to cut off after a certain period of time and say this DAO is now closed because everyone who is in at the early stage is considered a founder and everyone who comes in later is not. They're going to be considered investors and they're going to blow the project apart in terms of what a security is. So it doesn't mean the secondary trading could be limited significantly in those kinds of projects, but those that are planned from the beginning. I think could really have some legs to stand on. We're projecting out years now in terms of where the SEC and how the SEC would look at this and whether the courts would agree. But I think that it's more the creative way of looking at this and trying to decide how much capital can people put at risk safely. What, in your view, do you think is the right approach when it comes to in terms of regulating the crypto industry in the United States? Do you think that revelation by enforcement action is the way to go? It has done a lot of harm to the US industry. I don't think the SEC cares at this point about the crypto industry. You know it does not see it as a viable industry. I don't think that they've shown that it is a priority. I think they see it as a kind of stepchild of the greater securities industry. I have been in the industry for a couple of years now focused very heavily on the blockchain space and I've seen a lot of inquiries move from well maybe Wyoming DAO or a Delaware DAO using Delaware LLC code. We really need to look more seriously at offshore projects. And I say that it's accelerated over the last 12-18 months. Initially, you know a couple of years ago, everyone wanted to be in the US: they were looking at perhaps Colorado,UH Collective or Wyoming DAO and I'm getting those increased less frequently where even US-based projects are looking at saying we know that we will be subject to US jurisdiction in some degree want as much as possible to be outside of the US. That's been challenging for me in a good way I think because I've had to digest Singapore, Switzerland came in BI you know offshore jurisdictions that are that and I like to look at jurisdictions that are very forward thinking; those that are very technology-friendly and not those that are just kind of agnostic. Take Panama, for instance, where they don't apparently care about what's going on in the space and there are projects that flock to those kinds of jurisdictions. But I'm of the mind that projects that set up in jurisdictions that have a clear vast regime where they can point to and say we've we followed the regulations as far as we can and a lot of those vast regulatory guide, you know those guidelines are very clear or, at least, very well thought out And so I think the projects that are based in those jurisdictions will have a much better time interacting with the SEC than those that tried to go to jurisdictions where there is literally no governance at all. And they're just probably projecting up based on what they think will fly under the radar in those areas.

SEC v Ripple: Exclusive Interview With Web 3 Attorney, Jonathan Bench

Let's push the emperors into the ocean. Don't need a goon to flirt with devotion. With every hour, our number increases. We'll smash your institutions to pieces - Muse Crypto (1) vs SEC (0). F*ck yeah! I actually never liked Ripple, and I still don’t. Even though they have been one of the OG coins of the crypto market, they have been too centralized for my appetite. Nonetheless, what they recently pulled off against the SEC has put a special place in my heart for them. If you missed out on this news, here is the tl’dr - XRP is not a security! This is an incredible news for the crypto community. Not because we get to 100x degen on any DogeShibaElonInu listed on Uniswap but because now the crypto community gets a fair chance to fight back against biased old money moguls and mafia. I truly hope Coinbase can bring us another win. Ripple has also brought us a very important point to access. Which is, you may ask? Well, the take-home point for technologists out there is that - it’s not always about engineering or a killer product or some PhD-level research that pioneers innovation. Sometimes, it is overcoming a boring regulatory and operational landscape. Wait, did Slim Satoshi just say that Ripple is pioneering innovation in the crypto space? Damn right, I did. Not the way we want it to be - through technology or by fostering decentralization but through fighting against unfair regulatory hurdles. They have restored a bit of faith in the current US regulatory landscape. Now, a lot of crypto companies and protocols can continue to innovate and make risky bets in an uncertain market for the betterment of our economic and financial system. With XRP winning this case against the SEC, we can definitely say that not all days are dark in the cryptoverse. This will have a huge impact on the regulatory environment when it comes to crypto assets. Such as? Cryptocurrencies associated with largely decentralized protocols such as BTC, ETH could be considered a commodity within the financial asset class may not be considered as a security even though SEC deemed SOL, BNB, FIL, and ADA (to name a few) to be securities L1 and L2 protocols More transparency and clarity within the crypto space. This will force the SEC to stop pushing for biased enforcement against our industry No choke down on innovations in a fast-moving technology market that has the potential to benefit the many, and not the select few (Goldman Sachs?) We will keep fighting the good fight. We will let the ripples become bigger. And I’ll keep sharing humble opinions.

XRP (1) vs SEC (0) - In Ripple We Trust

The Southern District of New York has issued its long-awaited summary judgment ruling in the SEC v. Ripple case, and there's some game-changing news to discuss. TL;DR: Judge Torres’s ruling carries significant implications for the blockchain industry, specifically with regard to Ripple's Programmatic Sales. The court's decision and analysis regarding Ripple's public sales arguably blesses all public exchange sales of cryptocurrencies as non-securities under Howey. Additionally, the SEC’s separate allegations, suggesting that Coinbase acted as an unregistered exchange for securities, should not survive following this decision. Specifically, the court’s decision raises a question as to whether any of the other tokens listed on Coinbase (or any other exchange), which could be considered programmatic "blind sales," would fall under securities regulations. Background: Before we dig in, let's recap the Howey Test and the different types of buyers involved in this legal tussle. Howey is a 70-year-old case which, in the absence of new SEC rulemaking or Congressional lawmaking (neither of which have been forthcoming), courts use to analyze whether a sale constitutes an investment contract (e.g., a security) under the Securities Act. Howey analyzes three prongs: (i) whether money was invested by the buyer; (ii) whether there was a common enterprise; and (iii) whether the buyer had an expectation of profit solely from the efforts of others—typically the seller/issuer. If you fail any one prong, you are not a security. In Ripple, we have Institutional Buyers who had high expectations for Ripple's efforts to fuel the growth of the XRP ecosystem. On the flip side, we've got the Programmatic Buyers who engaged in blind bid/ask transactions on various crypto exchanges, unaware of the sellers' identities. The court ruled that Ripple’s sales of XRP to Institutional Buyers constituted sales of securities, but its sales to Programmatic Buyers, public sales on exchanges, did not constitute sales of securities. The Court's Analysis: The court's analysis of Ripple's Programmatic Sales focuses primarily on whether these sales satisfied the third prong of the Howey test – the expectation of profits derived from the efforts of others. Howey’s Third Prong: Lack of Reasonable Expectation According to the court, Programmatic Buyers who bought XRP via public exchanges couldn't reasonably expect Ripple's efforts to be the driving force behind their profits. The , stating, " " court focused on the lack of transparency in these blind transactions Programmatic Buyers could not have known if their payments of money went to Ripple or any other seller of XRP. This lack of clarity weakened the link between Ripple's efforts and the buyers' profit expectations. Speculative Motive and Promises Judge Torres addressed the SEC's argument that Ripple intentionally targeted speculators and understood that people were treating XRP as an investment. However, the court emphasized that speculation alone doesn't automatically make it an "investment contract" under securities laws. It stated, " But the expected return is not contingent upon the continuing efforts of another." Anyone who buys or sells a horse or an automobile hopes to realize a profitable 'investment." The court highlighted that Ripple's promises or offers to its Institutional Buyers were not relevant to Programmatic Buyers since they were unaware of buying XRP from Ripple. Critically, with respect to promises made by Ripple, the court noted: Ripple’s promotional materials, such as the “Ripple Primer” and the “Gateways” brochure, were widely circulated amongst potential investors like the Institutional Buyers. But there is no evidence that these documents were distributed more broadly to the general public, such as XRP purchasers on digital asset exchanges. Nor is there evidence that Programmatic Buyers understood that statements made by Larsen, Schwartz, Garlinghouse, and others were representations of Ripple and its efforts. Judge Torres also emphasized objectivity and the focus on promises and offers made to investors. " " The record establishes that with respect to Programmatic Sales, Ripple did not make any promises or offers because Ripple did not know who was buying the XRP, and the purchasers did not know who was selling it. Of course, some Programmatic Buyers may have purchased XRP with the expectation of profits to be derived from Ripple’s efforts. However, “[t]he inquiry is an objective one focusing on the promises and offers made to investors; it is not a search for the precise motivation of each individual participant.” The court took into major account that Ripple had not to circulated its promotional material to public buyers. Implications for the Blockchain Industry and Coinbase: Let’s explore the implications of this ruling for the blockchain industry. It's a significant win for public sales made by blockchain projects as the court recognizes that blind sales to public exchange buyers may not fall under securities regulations. This acknowledgment aligns with the unique characteristics of blockchain transactions and the decentralized nature of token exchanges. Arguably, post-TDE exchange sales, in the absence of speculative public statements, do not amount to an issuance because buyers do not know from whom they are buying: "Indeed, Ripple’s Programmatic Sales were blind bid/ask transactions, and Programmatic Buyers could not have known if their payments of money went to Ripple, or any other seller of XRP." Likewise, expectation of profit on the basis of the issuer is not met when the buyer does not know from whom they are buying: "Programmatic Buyers purchased XRP with an expectation of profit, but they did not derive that expectation from Ripple’s efforts (as opposed to other factors, such as general cryptocurrency market trends)—particularly because none of the Programmatic Buyers were aware that they were buying XRP from Ripple." This ruling raises intriguing questions about the recent case against Coinbase, where the SEC alleged that Coinbase acted as an unregistered exchange for securities. Under the Ripple analysis, it casts doubts on whether any of the other tokens listed on Coinbase, which could be considered programmatic "blind sales," would actually fall under securities regulations. It will be interesting to see how this ruling's precedent affects the ongoing legal battles and whether it prompts the SEC to reconsider its approach to token sales conducted on platforms like Coinbase.

SEC v. Ripple's Programmatic Sales Ruling Paves the Way for Public Token Exchange

এসইসি বনাম রিপলের প্রোগ্রাম্যাটিক সেলস রুলিং পাবলিক টোকেন এক্সচেঞ্জের পথ প্রশস্ত করে

Das Programmatic-Sales-Urteil der SEC gegen Ripple ebnet den Weg für den öffentlichen Token-Austausch

El fallo de ventas programáticas de SEC v. Ripple allana el camino para el intercambio público de tokens

La décision de vente programmatique de SEC c. Ripple ouvre la voie à l'échange de jetons publics

एसईसी बनाम रिपल का प्रोग्रामेटिक सेल्स रूलिंग सार्वजनिक टोकन एक्सचेंज का मार्ग प्रशस्त करता है

SEC対リップルのプログラマティック販売判決がパブリックトークン交換への道を開く

SEC 대 Ripple의 프로그래밍 방식 판매 판결로 공개 토큰 교환의 길을 열다

SEC v. A decisão de vendas programáticas da Ripple abre caminho para a troca de tokens públicos

SEC ve Ripple'ın Programatik Satış Kararı Halka Açık Token Değişiminin Yolunu Açıyor

SEC v. Phán quyết bán hàng theo chương trình của Ripple mở đường cho trao đổi mã thông báo công khai

SEC 诉 Ripple 程序化销售裁决为公共代币交易铺平道路

In a groundbreaking ruling that is sending shockwaves through the cryptocurrency world, United States District Judge Analisa Torres declared that XRP, the digital asset at the center of a high-stakes legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), is not a security. With the gavel’s resounding strike, Judge Torres shattered expectations, revealing a verdict that will undoubtedly shape the future of the crypto landscape. While the ruling brings newfound clarity to XRP’s legal status, it also raises intriguing questions about the implications for Ripple, the broader crypto industry, and individual investors. The reverberations of this decision have already ignited a surge in XRP’s value, leaving social media ablaze with speculation and the entire cryptocurrency market experiencing a significant uptick. As we delve into the ramifications of this landmark case, it becomes increasingly evident that Ripple’s victory carries far-reaching consequences that extend well beyond its own corporate interests. The Official Ruling On July 13th, United States District Judge Analisa Torres officially ruled that XRP is not a security. US Judge Torres ruled that XRP sold on exchanges “programmatically” to public buyers “did not constitute the offer and sale of investment contracts”. The ruling came down to the third part of the in which the Judge determined that programmatic buyers could not reasonably expect a profit, or an increased value to their investment. Howey test However, the US Judge did rule that “Ripple’s Institutional Sales of XRP constituted the unregistered offer and sale of investment contracts in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act.” The court found that Ripple sold $728.9 million of XRP directly to certain Institutional Buyers in written contracts. Judge Torres determined that these direct sales were made by investors who “would have purchased XRP with the expectation that they would derive profits from Ripple’s efforts.” Here is a direct link to the official ruling by US District Judge Analisa Torres: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.551082/gov.uscourts.nysd.551082.874.0.pdf “Having considered the economic reality of the Programmatic Sales, the Court concludes that the undisputed record does not establish the third Howey prong. Whereas the Institutional Buyers reasonably expected that Ripple would use the capital it received from its sales to improve the XRP ecosystem and thereby increase the price of XRP. Programmatic Buyers could not reasonably expect the same. Indeed, Ripple’s Programmatic Sales were blind bid/ask transactions, and Programmatic Buyers could not have known if their payments of money went to Ripple, or any other seller of XRP. Since 2017, Ripple’s Programmatic Sales represented less than 1% of the global XRP trading volume. Therefore, the vast majority of individuals who purchased XRP from digital asset exchanges did not invest their money in Ripple at all. An Institutional Buyer knowingly purchased XRP directly from Ripple pursuant to a contract, but the economic reality is that a Programmatic Buyer stood in the same shoes as a secondary market purchaser who did not know to whom or what it was paying its money.” - United States District Judge Analisa Torres What’s Next? Unsurprisingly, XRP has exploded for a 30% gain in the short time since the news dropped. Social media is going wild with hype, and all cryptocurrencies seem to be experiencing gains as well. Many have speculated about what would happen after a Ripple victory in this landmark case, but now we are living it, and it will be exciting to see what actually happens from here on out. Personally, I think this was an extremely important legal victory for Ripple, as well as the rest of the crypto industry and even individuals like us. I want to take a moment here to thank Ripple for taking on the SEC in a fight and scoring a huge win. What are your thoughts on this news? How high will XRP rise? What does this mean for the world of cryptocurrency? Check out my Socials: https://linktr.ee/zerorequiem0x Also published here

RIPPLE

ripple.com

501-1K employees

Since 2012

COMPANY RANKING

RIPPLE

EVERGREEN INDEX #9239

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Ripple WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

RIPPLE

ripple.com

501-1K employees

Since 2012

COMPANY RANKING

RIPPLE

EVERGREEN INDEX #9239

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT RIPPLE

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Ripple WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!